Liza Hopkin’s paper, Muslim
Turks and Anti-Muslim Discourse: The effects of media constructions of ‘Islamic’
and ‘Arabic’ in Australia, highlights the tendency by media in Australia to
represent Muslims in Australia as Arabic or Lebanese thereby not taking into
consideration “sectarian differences; national, ethnic and tribal diversity;
linguistic divergence; and political, social and economic disparities” (2008, 41-42).
Hopkins views the experiences of Turkish
Australians to illustrate the problems faced and caused by this view.
Image: www.smh.com.au |
Even within the category of Turkish speaking Australians,
there are three groups – Turks, Kurds and Cypriots. Each of these groups has
their own history of migration to Australia that is, migrating at different times
and for different reasons (Hopkins 2008, 52). The Turkish represented the “first
major Muslim wave of immigrants” to Australia and although they experienced
racism similarly to that of other post-war migrants from Europe, they were “generally
well regarded” due to the “nationally binding sentiments that had developed
around the battle of Gallipoli”. However, events occurring in 2011, that is,
public knowledge of the gang rapes in Sydney, the attacks on the World Trade
Centre and the Tampa crisis, contributed to an anti-Muslim sentiment in
Australia (Hopkins 2008, 47). Turkish-Australians, although not Arabic speaking
or Lebanese, are included in the blanket term of Muslim and therefore subjected
to the stereotyping and racism that they did not previously experience or
endure.
Turkish-Australians are more likely to identity culturally,
nationally or linguistically than they are to identify religiously as Muslims (Hopkins
2008, 51). The term “Muslim” is too narrow to encompass the diversity of
Muslims in Australia, just as the term “Christian” or “Buddhist” does not take
into account other aspects of people of those religions. Hopkins (2008, 45)
highlights the plight of the migrant with regard to cultural identity:
“In the context of international migration, retaining cultural identity
and cultural ties may be as much about negotiating a place for oneself within a
small diasporic group, coupled with the transmission of cultural and ethical
norms and values to the next generation, as about negotiating with the
mainstream of the host society.”
References
Hopkins, Liza. “Muslim
Turks and Anti-Muslim Discourse: The effects of media constructions of ‘Islamic’
and ‘Arabic’ in Australia”. Australian
Journal of Communication 35, no. 1(2008): 41-55.
No comments:
Post a Comment